Validated instruments for CME satisfaction outcomes

Here are three tools for assessing participant satisfaction with CME that have gone through some validity testing:

  1. Wood TJ, et al. The development of a participant questionnaire to assess continuing medical education presentations. Medical Education 2005;39:568-72. (abstract)
  2. Rothman AI, Sibbald G. Evaluating Medical Grand Rounds. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 2002;22:77-83. (abstract)
  3. Shewchuk RM, et al. A Standardized Approach to Assessing Physician Expectations and Perceptions of Continuing Medical Education. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 2007;27:173-82. (abstract)

I expect there’s a few more, but not many (post a comment if you have other examples).

Just because satisfaction outcome isn’t one of the ACCME big three (i.e., competency, performance, or patient outcome) doesn’t mean it isn’t useful.  The original Kirkpatrick scale (1) later adapted by Moore (2) both say that assessing satisfaction is a necessary precursor to such higher level outcomes.  Satisfaction data makes it easier to tease out what elements of a CME activity are to praise or blame when interpreting competency, performance or patient level outcomes.  And with so few validated instruments for assessing satisfaction, this is hardly an area that we’ve adequately covered.

References:

1. Kirkpatrick, D.L. (1994). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

2. Moore DE. A framework for outcomes evaluation in the continuing professional development of physicians. In: Davis D, Barnes BE, Fox R (eds). The Continuing Professional Development of Physicians: from Research to Practice. Chicago: American Medical Association, 2003.

Advertisements

4 Comments

Filed under Outcomes, Satisfaction

4 responses to “Validated instruments for CME satisfaction outcomes

  1. Pingback: Reliability & Validity « assessCME

  2. Pingback: Why are there seven levels of CME outcome if we only care about physician performance and patient health change? « assessCME

  3. Pingback: Why are there seven levels of CME outcomes if we only care about physician performance and patient health change? | assessCME

  4. Daniel G

    Certainly one cannot expect physician behavior change if s/he a) didn’t participate, or b) wasn’t satisfied with the content. #can’tgetLevel6withoutLevels1and2

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s